December 26, 2024

Brighton Journal

Complete News World

The Maduro dictatorship has admitted to illegally spying on UN experts during their stay in Venezuela.

The Maduro dictatorship has admitted to illegally spying on UN experts during their stay in Venezuela.
Venezuela's dictator, Nicolás Maduro, EFE/ Miguel Gutierrez
Venezuela’s dictator, Nicolás Maduro, EFE/ Miguel Gutierrez

In a statement Nicolás Maduro’s regime, He rejected the “preliminary report” of UN Committee of Election Experts, The Chavista dictatorship confirms that Venezuelan authorities engaged in illegal spying during the visit of experts.

The official document alleges that the team of experts was in frequent contact with the authorities United States DeptAccording to the regime, he will make his statements as a result of hostile instructions emanating from the North American nation.

This fact, if true, shows that the dictatorship monitored and interfered with the conversations the experts had during their stay in the Caribbean country.

The part in question is this: “It is noted that during their stay in Venezuela, members of this bogus expert group frequently had direct contact with US State Department officials via telephone and video conferences.”

The UN is criticized by the regime Nicolás Maduro Experts say that Domenico Tucinardi (Italian and Head of Delegation), Fernanda Abreu (Portuguese), Rolly Davila (Guatemala) and Maria de Lourdes González It had access to all stages of the (Mexican) election process, in which Maduro was fraudulently declared the winner. However, the official report denounced that the experts “made irresponsible comments and served the coup interests of the Venezuelan far-right”, communicating with these leaders before, during and after the elections.

The Venezuelan regime said the report “spreads a series of falsehoods, in content and methodology, violating not only the principles governing the work of the groups of experts, but also the terms of reference signed with the Venezuelan electoral authority.” This rejection, according to them, is an act of propaganda.

See also  Santiago Cafiro, a chief executive in the shadow

The experts’ approach was described by the Maduro regime as unethical and unprofessional. According to the report, the actions of these individuals “have left a negative mark and promoted a violent agenda aimed at damaging Venezuelan democracy and sowing doubts about the functioning of its institutions.”

The Maduro dictatorship has come under criticism from the UN since it revealed the level of intelligence the regime used against international observers and monitored the communications of experts during their stay in Venezuela.

This event has provoked adverse reactions and many debates in the international community regarding the situation in Venezuela and the rigor of UN monitoring. Despite the regime’s accusations, the UN The experts said their work was carried out with the aim of fair and impartial review of the electoral process.

Statement of Chavismo
Statement of Chavismo
Second part of the report
Second part of the report
The final part of the report
The final part of the report

The situation in Venezuela It continues to be monitored by international organizations, and the reported spying incident highlights the difficulties observers face in highly politically tense environments. After these revelations, the future of cooperation and technical assistance in these situations has been called into question.

The reason for the regime’s attack on UN experts UN General Secretariat That concluded this Tuesday National Election Council (CNE) under the dictatorship of Venezuela Nicolás MaduroDisregarding regulations while publishing July 28 election results. He also highlighted that the absence of comprehensive results is unprecedented in contemporary electoral history in the Caribbean country.

“It also did not follow national legal and regulatory provisions, and all established deadlines were missed,” the report said.

See also  Blue dollar and dollar today: This Tuesday, July 18, minute by minute | This is how it works for buying and selling

This had a negative impact on the confidence of a large part of the Venezuelan electorate in the results announced by the CNE.” said United Nations experts.

According to reviews carried out by the committee’s experts, “a small sample” of the minutes released by the opposition provided all the safeguards associated with the original results protocol.

This suggests that important safeguards of transparency may be available in relation to officially published results.“, they added.

They also noted that the results showed that the electronic transmission started working properly, but was suddenly interrupted after a few hours. Closure of polling stationsWithout any explanation or information being given to the candidates or the UN team at that time.

Instead, when announcing the results, the president of the CNE was a “Terrorist cyber attack Affected the transfer and caused delay in indexing process. However, the dictatorship’s election system “decided to postpone three major post-election audits, including the communications system, which clarified the possible occurrence of external attacks against the transmission infrastructure.”

On the night of July 28, the CNE announced Nicolás Maduro as the winner 5,150,092 votes (51.2%), followed by a stable opposition Edmundo Gonzalez Urrutia With 4,445,978 votes (44.2%), however, it has yet to release the split results confirming the victory of the Caribbean dictator, which has been questioned by many countries and organizations. Carter Center, He participated in the elections as an observer.

25 people were killed, 192 were injured and more than 2,400 were detained.