The Supreme Court of the United States is preparing to rescind the right to abortion

Supreme Court United StatesWith a Conservative majority, Preparing to cancel Historical ruling Row versus Wade, which includes ownership Abortion In the country since 1973, according to the majority opinion poll released this Monday Politician.

Draft by Judge Samuel Alito, from February and Spread within the court. It is true that it has been leaked – The This is the first time this has happened– This topic shows how controversial it is and all the controversy it brings.

Majority draft, a Total and unshakable denial The 1973 decision to guarantee the federal constitutional protection of abortion rights and the subsequent 1992 decision – Planned Parenthood v. Casey – It was mostly owned.

“Rowe was very wrong From the beginning, “writes Alito.

“We believe Roy and Casey should be ignored,” he writes in the document. “Opinion of the Court”. “It is time to focus on constitutional law and return the issue of abortion to the elected representatives of the people,” Politico said in a statement.

The debate on controversial cases has been smooth in the past. Judges may change and sometimes change their vote when draft ideas are circulated, and key decisions may be subject to multiple draft and negotiation votes, sometimes up to a few days before a decision is published. Judgment of the Court It is not final until it is releasedProbably next Two months.

Unpublished leak in judicial history

But this was an issue that the former president has had a conservative majority since Donald Trump Tilted the scales Placing two judges.

Should have an immediate impact on the verdict The end of a half-century guarantee for constitutional protection The right to abortion and allow each state to decide whether to restrict or prohibit it. A) Yes, Each state can make its own decisions About abortion.

Abolishing Rowe could immediately lead to stricter restrictions on access to large-scale abortions. South and MidwestNearly half the states are ready to impose immediately Broad barriers to abortion. Any state can legally allow this practice.

No plan The verdict was published in the modern history of the court In general, the scope of Politico is very important when a case is still pending. Expression Without precedents This session of the Court aims to intensify the debate on what is already the most controversial case.

Provides draft feedback An unusual window for discussions Judges of one of the most important cases before the court in the last five decades.

Some court experts predict that the Conservative majority will cut abortion rights without completely breaking the 49-year-old precedent. The draft shows that the court wants to go further and seek to overturn the logic and legal protections of the judgment.

Someone familiar with the court’s arguments told Politico that the other four judges appointed by the Republicans were Clarence Thomas, Neil Korsch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Connie Barrett. They voted with Alito At a conference between the judges after hearing oral arguments in December, the order remained unchanged this week.

Appointed three judges DemocratsWorks by Stephen Fryer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan One or more disagreements. It is unclear how Chief Justice John Roberts will vote and whether he will agree with the already written opinion or create his own draft.

If the draft is approved, the court will rule in favor of Mississippi, which seeks to ban most abortions. After 15 weeks of pregnancy.

The court did not comment on the draft considered by the experts Is real. There is a draft comment 98 pages, Including a 31-page backlink to major state abortion laws. The document is packed with quotations from previous court judgments, books and other powers, and includes 118 Footnotes.

Alito’s draft expressing majority opinion, a Rare violation of Supreme Court secrecy The secret legacy of its debate is that all parties to the abortion debate are preparing for power. Speculation about the outcome has been intense since oral arguments in December indicated that the majority wanted to support Mississippi law.

“It simply came to our notice then The right to abortion is not deeply rooted In the history and traditions of the nation “, writes Alito.

Alito’s support for Rowe and the approval of at least four judges for that relentless criticism is a step towards turning the court’s right in recent decades. Rowe ended 7-2 in 1973, with five Republican nominees joining two judges nominated by Democratic presidents.

“The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of every state from regulating or prohibiting abortion,” the draft states: “Rowe and Casey They usurped that power. We now reverse those decisions and return that power to the people and their elected representatives.

DS